TAWHID=MONOTHEISM ITS THEOLOGY WITHIN JIHADIST ISLAM AND ITS DIAMETRICAL OPPOSITION TO THE SECULARIST HUMANIST WESTERN GOVERNMENTS.
The flag of Tawhid literally monotheism. The black flag of Tawhid is in emulation of the black flags of the prophet Muhammad, as per the Islamist’s, like those who populate Islamic State and al-Qaeda. Hence their Salafist creed, since Salafi references the “ancestors”, meaning those who came before in the Islamic tradition, with Muhammad as the “ideal” Muslim the one to be emulated by all. Whaqt follows is an example of a fundamentalist creed within Islam: “Since the revival of jihād more than thirty years ago, mujāhid leaders have stated that jihād – on the personal level – consists of strides on a roadmap towards shahādah.
One first performs hijrah to the lands of jihād (now, dārul-Islām), then gives
bay’ah, pledging what it entails of obedience (sam’ and tā’ah) to the amīr (now, the Khalīfah) and commitment to the jamā’ah (now, the Khilāfah), then trains (i’dād) for the purpose of jihād, then patiently spends months of rībat, serves countless hours of guard duty (hirāsah), then fights (qitāl) in battles and kills (qatl) whom he can from amongst the kāfir enemy, and finally achieves shahādah. This map is based on texts from the Qur’ān and Sunnah3 linking these deeds to each other, the experience gained by living jihād on a day to day basis, and the observation of the shuhadā’ and their caravans. Of course, there are always exceptions, such as the muhājir who achieves shahādah during his training camp or the murābit who achieves it on his first day of ribāt. But this is the roadmap every mujāhid should grasp so as to maximize the fruits of his jihād. Otherwise, how can one expect to be patient on the fearsome battlefield while not enduring the hardships of ribāt? May Allah (ta’ālā) grant every Muslim the blessing of ribāt at the Khilāfah frontier posts and the patience needed to keep him firm until he meets Him.
History has shown that colonialism in all of its guises and permutations, has been and is still part and parcel of our present geo-political malaise. I fully concur with certain fundamentalist’s in the ME, when they assert that colonialism left the path open today, that is the present ME geo-political reality of our times. The Islamic State asserted in their 9th issue of Dabiq page 20 that: “As a number of military factions in the lands of the so called“Arab Spring” raise banners of a jāhilī origin, and because a number of jihād claimants have permitted and justified the raising of these banners in their supposed territories, even supporting the carriers of these banners
from amongst the apostate Sahwah1 against the Islamic State, it becomes important to enlighten the Muslim Ummah about the history behind these banners. The historical origin of the “Arab Spring” banners – rather most of the flags raised by the various apostate Arab regimes – is a flag designed by the British
crusader Mark Sykes. Yes, Mark Sykes of the Sykes- Picot Agreement, which divided the
At left is a depiction of crusader knight
who fought against Muhammad’s armies. The crusader cross on the banner is the
same cross, that General Martin Dempsey the current top-US general below, is being
given photo , it is literally a meritorious medal from a specific “Order” called The Medal for Knights Commanders Cross of The Order of Merit, from
General Volker Wieker, a German general in the NATO coalition. The West’s politicians claim that they are not at
war with Islam, that there is no clash of civilizations. The West’s
government’s are all “secularist-humanist”, some with a “democratic” bent and other’s as is the case with European
countries like the Netherlands, France and Britain are secular humanist
governments with pronounced libertarian socialist nations. The ideology of the
Western world is diametrically opposed to the fundamentalist theology of the
Muslim Ummah. There can be no reconciliation between a fundamentalist religion
and a secular government. Frankly the Western political ideology opposes all
forms of fundamentalism even the so called “Christian
Fundamentalism”, in the West. Hence the movements like al-Qaeda and Islamic
State are correct, when they state that the west is at war with Islam, it’s
been that way literally for hundreds of years.
Muslims’ lands into nationalist states, the same
crusader who also promoted the infamous Balfour Declaration behind the
establishment of the Jewish state. Black was chosen to represent the ‘Abbāsī
state, white to represent the Umawī state, green to
represent the ‘Ubaydī (“Fātimī”) state, and red to represent
the late “Sharīf ”2 leadership of Hijāz. In this symbolism, he mixed
between Islamic khulafā’, apostate Ismā’īliyyah, and apostate agents. He needed
to give his Arab followers something symbolic, historical, material, and uniquely
“Arabian” for them to rally around.
This jāhilī banner became the flag of the so-called“Arab Revolt” he engineered. The flag
was initially manufactured in Egypt by the British Military to
be raised by their allies. Sykes’s allies from
amongst the Arab nationalists
used a line of poetry written by Safī ad-Dīn al- Hillī
– who died in 750AH – to endorse these jāhilī symbols. Al-Hillī said, “Our deeds are white, our battles are black,
our fields are green, and our swords are red.” No doubt, his line of poetry
was written hundreds of years before the “Arab
Revolt.” Sykes, together with his peers and leaders, devised a plan to
further divide the broken Muslims’ lands into nationalist states. The Muslims’
lands had been polluted by pagan domes (for grave worship) and plagued by
manmade laws at the hands of Ottoman rulers, especially in the last two centuries
before the eventual collapse of Ottoman reign. This fragile condition coupled
with the policy of turkification – which promoted Turkish nationalism and
degraded the Arabic language –
The British began negotiating with al- Husayn Ibn
‘Alī3 (the “Sharīf ” of Hijāz – died1350AH/1931CE) to
rebel and declare an independent Arab nationalist state. Al-Husyan Ibn ‘Alī
revolted against his former Ottoman masters and declared himself, with the
permission of the British, “Sultan of the
Arab Lands” and
“Caliph” over a nationalist “caliphate” erected by the crusaders! He
did not wage jihād for Allah’s
cause to rid the Muslims’ lands of manmade laws and
pagan domes and thereby establish a shar’ī khilāfah. Rather he fought merely to
unify the “Arab” lands alone under a
nationalist “caliphate” that he would
rule over, but under the direction of
his new crusader masters. During the various
battles he and his sons led in
the “Arab Revolt,” their soldiers were accompanied and
supported by British crusaders including Herbert Garland, and Captain T.E.
Lawrence (the so-called “Lawrence of
Arabia”), French crusaders including Colonel Edouard Bremond, Captain
Rosario Pisanim, Claude Prost, and Laurent Depui,
and French apostates including Captain Muhammad Ould Ali Raho. The British
would even intervene with their navy and air force in battles to give al-Husayn
and his sons the upper hand against their rivals. Al-Husayn and his sons meticulously
obeyed the orders dictated to them by the British crusaders so as to guarantee
their backing. The British eventually appointed them as kings over Syria,
Jordan, Iraq, and Hijāz. The current tāghūt of Jordan is a descendent of this same
family. (one of their former allies), Iraq to other more “ideological” Arab
nationalists, and Hijāz to the apostates favored by the British, ‘Abdul-‘Azīz
Ibn Sa’ūd and his sons. The British realized ‘Abdul- ‘Azīz and his sons could
not and would never call for further expansion of their kingdom outside of
their crusader designated territory under the claim of a “caliphate,” contrary to al-Husayn and his sons who – due to their
Qurashī lineage– had entertained the idea of a “caliphate,” albeit
a nationalist one built by crusaders. The British thereby
betrayed the nationalist “caliphate”
they themselves had once supported. The various apostate puppet regimes set up
by the crusaders after the colonial era all have modified versions of the first
flag designed by Mark Sykes, sometimes using three of the four original
colours. The “Arab Revolt” flag was the father of flags that today represent
different Arab nationalist states
Libya, Sudan, Syria (both regime and revolution), United
Arab Emirates, Yemen, and Palestine, various Arab nationalist movements in
regions of Somalia, Morocco, Mali, and Iran, as well as the apostate Ba’th
party and its apostate Naqshabandī “army”. These jāhilī flags essentially represent
the crusaders, their apostate agents, Arab nationalism, and the puppet tawāghīt
loyal to the crusaders. This brief history should spell out a number of lessons:
1) The crusaders do not have a problem with flattering their allies by
propagating “Islamic” symbolism or
allowing their allies to do so, as long as it is tainted with some nationalism.
2) The crusaders rely upon the strategy of “divide and conquer.” They break up
Muslims’ lands through nationalism, partisanship, and other forms of
jāhiliyyah. They might even support the supposedly “more Islamic” party against
the more secularist parties, if they feel the latter are not capable of
preserving their interests in the region, like they supported the false
“Salafī” ‘Abdul-‘Azīz against the Sūfī al-Husayn. And this is what is expected
in Shām. As the Free Syrian Army has failed to secure any Western interests
whereas the “Islamic” Front has succeeded, the “Islamic” Front will most likely
win the greater favour of the crusaders through their
Gulf and Turkish mediators.
Image: The present geo-political theatre of war. The map
shown above has the initial alliances and players that make up Ezekiel 38.
I want to place emphasis on the
unfolding current geo-political reality that is the Middle East, with
particular reference to Syria in light of bible prophecy and in particular
Ezekiel 38. The causes that led to the present situation in the region are myriad;
I will examine some of them in
light of the “foreign policy”, of the US and her allies and proxies, then link
the afore mentioned to the biblical prophecies and specifically the Ezekiel 38
prophecies.
In this section, I will quote
from: (War on Syria Gateway to World
WarIII), by Nile Bowie and Tony Cartalucci. In the book, they detail how
several months of turmoil in Tunisia, led to the series of events referred to
as the “Arab Spring”, which embroiled
several North African
countries. Among the peaceful
demonstrators were “local dissidents”,
who were there for specific reasons, and to trigger and stage events, in favour
of their paymasters.
The dissidents were trained and funded, largely by foreign powers many of whom were funded by the United States Department of State. Some organizations involved in key areas of support are Freedom House, the National Endowment for Democracy, and two of its satellite organizations, the International Republican Institute, and the National Democratic Institute, the organizations mentioned were involved in recruiting, training and supporting the unrest from as early as 2008. An Al-Jazeera article sums up the Syrian reality even when the protest’s,
were being branded as “peaceful”: “People marching on an overpass were met with a hail of gunfire, many people certainly wounded directly in front of us, cars turned around, and I can tell you it was an incredibly chaotic scene, and it seems as though pretty much everyone down here in the southern part of the country is now carrying weapons. It is unclear who was firing at whom, that’s part of the confusion ... but clearly a very violent incident now being carried out here in the south of the country”.
The cryptic description of the preceding corroborates the Assad regimes statements that they were not, the only ones with guns. Reports of rooftop snipers and mysterious gunmen continued to emerge, in Syria during the events described, increasingly there is evidence that some of the snipers and gunmen were funded and trained by Western governments including the US.
The Examiner reports: “The fighters are being recruited from the various Libyan militias, which fought the Gaddafi regime. About 4,000 have volunteered to fight with anti-Assad forces,
accepting the offer of $1,000 signing bonus, in addition to a monthly wage of $450,
paid for, according to some unconfirmed reports in freshly printed ‘crisp’ brand new American $100 dollar bills, leading some to believe that this is US taxpayer funds
being used here. Upon landing in Turkey, the Libyan fighters and the arms shipments
are offloaded from the planes and then loaded on trucks to Free Syrian Army bases,
most of which are located in the Iskenderun region of Turkey on the border of north western Syria. They receive military training from Western, Turkish and Arab
army instructors, as well as civilian security consultants and ex-special forces trainers
from the US, Britain, France, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar.
The Telegraph reported that members of the Libyan National Transitional Council met with members of the Syrian National Council, to offer money, weapons and training to Syrian “rebel fighters”: read terrorists. Military intelligence sources in Libya, Abdul Hakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and former leader of the militant Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), listed as a terrorist group by the US department of State. Belhadj met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul Turkey.
Image: Left to right
CT Senator Richard Bumenthal, Abdul Hakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli
Military Council and former leader of the militant Libyan Islamic Fighting
Group (LIFG), listed as a terrorist group by the US department of State, with
John McCain and SC Senator Lindsey Graham.
It is interesting how McCain has the uncanny trait of always, appearing
publicly in the presence of, “brutal terrorists”. Belhadj is now the
ISIS/Islamic State commander in Libya, Belhadj was referred to as a “moderate”,
by US officials. Belhadj was instrumental in forming the “Libya Dawn”,
essentially various Islamist groups aligned under his LIFG. The LIFG was called
Al-Qaeda in Libya and has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Iamge: Belhadj in his role as “general”, of the LIFG. The
following is from the online magazine Dabiq issue #8, wherein the Islamic State
clearly and in a concise manner laid bare their, enmity towards Belhadj and his
ilk.
“During
the uprising against the Libyan tāghūt Gaddafi in 1432AH a number of deviant
individuals gathered together in the city of Benghazi to form and subsequently
gain Western support for a political entity that would carry the kufrī banner
of democracy. This entity, known as the National Transitional Council (NTC),
would pave the way for the formation of a new puppet government and the
appointment of yet another tāghūt to replace the former tāghūt.
The
NTC gained the recognition and support of the crusader nations as it went on to
fill the seat
of the former Libyan tāghūt at the United
Nations. The UN then gave the green light for the crusader nations to establish
a no-fly zone over Libya and intervene militarily in support of their new
puppets.
Following the extermination of the Libyan clown Gaddafi, the NTC
continued its efforts to further corrupt the affairs of the people. It
introduced a new kufrī constitution to replace Gaddafi’s own kufrī manifesto,
and held elections to appoint members to the General National Congress(GNC).
The GNC was the legislative authority (above a meeting convened by
GNC),
that would hold the “power” to introduce even more manmade laws.
This set the stage for the democratic “Islamists” on the manhaj of the bankrupt
“Muslim” Brotherhood to take control of the government by fielding candidates
to run in the shirkī democratic elections. With the GNC under their control,
the democratic “Islamists” and their secularist allies put the rule of Allah to
a vote, seeking to cut up and implement bits and
pieces of “Sharī’ah” upon the filthy, conflicting, and hostile
foundation of democracy. The
“Islamist”-dominated GNC voted to implement a butchered form of “Sharī’ah,” but
the hardcore secularists and their crusader backers wouldn’t stand for it. Just
as they couldn’t tolerate the pure Islam being fought for by the sincere
mujāhidīn in Libya, the crusaders couldn’t accept the distorted and diluted
version of “Islam” being practiced by the murtadd democratic “Islamists.”
So
the crusaders set loose their more devoted allies – the more secular of the two
groups – and by Allah’s grace the divided camp of kufr began devouring itself.
On one side, the secularist murtaddīn rallied behind the crusaders’ newest
asset, Khalifa Haftar, who launched “Operation Dignity” to take back control of
the country and place it in the hands of the hardcore secularists, who make up
the bulk of the House of Representatives. On the other side, armed groups loyal
to the democratic murtaddīn rallied behind the GNC under the banner of the
“Libyan Dawn” and fought back against Haftar’s campaign in an effort to
maintain their grip on power, eventually capturing the airport in Tarābulus.
Some of the factions belonging to the “Libyan Dawn” are former jihād claimants,
including the democratic “Islamist” Abdelhakim Belhadj and other former members
of al-Jamā’ah al-Islāmiyyah al-Muqātilah bi-Lībyā (the Libyan Islamic Fighting
Group). These former jihād claimants apostatized and joined the religion of
democracy by entering into its system and fighting for its upholding. As the
situation escalated and the factions of riddah continued fighting one another,
Allah facilitated the emergence of the Islamic State
on
the Libyan scene, with a number of mujāhid groups across the three Libyan
wilāyāt of Barqah, Fazzān, and Tarābulus declaring their bay’ah to
Amīrul-Mu’minīn. Having unified their strength and rallied behind the banner of
the Khilāfah, the mujāhidīn of Libya intensified their campaign against both
factions of riddah, after these factions had betrayed the religion and its
people. The mujāhidīn had no need to distinguish between those who betrayed
Islam
by
adopting the kufr of secularism, and those who betrayed Islam by adopting the
kufr of democracy, for both factions had entered the camp of kufr. {And fight
against the disbelievers collectively as they fight against you collectively}
[At-Tawbah: 36]. As the battle in Libya continues to intensify, the Islamic
State enjoys greater consolidation. The hukm of Allah is established, the needs
of the Muslims are cared for, and the armies of the Khilāfah continue marching
forward to liberate new regions. Libya has become an ideal land of
hijrah
for those who find difficulty making their way to Shām, particularly those of
our brothers
and
sisters in Africa.
We
ask Allah to continue strengthening and consolidating the muwahhiddīn of Libya,
and to
continue
casting the murtaddīn beneath their feet”.
Image: The logo and creed of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Belhadj, fought with the Taliban
against US troops in Afghanistan, he was caught by the CIA in Malaysia in 2003
and extradited to Libya, where he was imprisoned under the Khadafi regime.
Belhadj publicly admitted that fighters from his LIFG were the second largest
brigade of foreign fighters in Iraq. The
evidence presented in the preceding, is corroborated by the vast array of, public
documents that prove, and show a direct link between the Western backed forces
in Libya and those tasked with toppling the Assad regime in Syria.
Image:The cover of the US Army’s West Point Combating Terrorism
Center report, “Al-Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq.”
This
report produced at West Point Military Academy in New York, is a damning
self-indictment of the US, government by some of its own scholars. Though the
authors inserted a disclaimer claiming that: “The views expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not reflect
the U.S. Military Academy, the Department of Defence, or the U.S. Government”.
The actual report bears, the logo of the
Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. Both authors Joseph Felter and Brian
Fishman, from their own report for all intents and purposes are either
employees of the US government, or were hired by the CTC, to compile said
report, whichever point is correct, the report itself, is an official project
of the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Military Academy, resultantly
the published content in the report implicating the US government as a sponsor
of terrorist groups is indeed damning. From the report itsel page 10: “In March 2007, the LIFG’s senior ideologue, Abu Yahya al‐Libi, weighed in on al‐
Qa’ida’s controversial declaration of an Islamic State of Iraq”. Abu Yahya al-Libi is qouted as saying in the West Point report: “our brothers are in need of the backing and aid of the Muslim peoples, with their bodies and wealth, with shelter and prayer, and with incitement.
There is no way to establish and preserve
states other than Jihad in the Path of Allah and
Jihad alone. This is the path, and anything else is from the whispers of Satan”. “Whether there was a spring 2007 Libyan surge or not, the Libyan pipeline to Iraq
seems firmly established. The vast majority (84.2%) of Libyans that recorded
their route to Iraq arrived via the same pathway running through Egypt and then
by air to Syria. This recruiting and logistics network is likely tied to LIFG, which
has long ties (not all positive) with Egyptian and Algerian Islamist groups”.
The announcement that LIFG had officially sworn allegiance to al‐Qa’ida was
long‐expected by observers of the group. Both the ideologue Abu Yahya al‐Libi
and the military leader Abu Layth al‐Libi have long histories with the LIFG, and
are increasingly prominent figures along the Afghanistan‐Pakistan border and in
al‐Qa’ida’s propaganda.” The assertions in the CTC “Foreign Fighters”, report are in full
agreement with the claims made in this book that the terrorist LIFG are
inordinately represented in Syria, the evidence proves that this was no mere coincidence
but part of a well formulated wider plot, involving both British and US
intelligence. The following graphs from the CTC report further lends credence
to the claims made in this book.
Image: Left WestPoint’s Combating Terrorism
Center’s report from 2007, entitled: ““Al-Qa’ida’s
Foreign Fighters in Iraq” indicates which areas in Syria Al-Qa’ida
fighters filtering into Iraq come from. The majority come from Dayr-Al Zawr in
Syria’s southeast, Idlib in the north near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dara
in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border. The map at right showing the
epicentre of the Syrian violence indicate that the exact same hotbeds
for Al Qaeda in 2007, now serve as the epicentres of so-called “pro-democracy
fighters.”
Image:
This chart shows the foreign fighters
countries of origin and foreign fighters per capita. The graph at right clearly
shows Libya as the country with the highest per capita of fighters, in
comparison to population ratio of their home country, simply put Libyans are
overwhelmingly represented in Syria, proving my assertions previously made
pertinent to same.
Image: The graph above at right and left clearly show
Darnah and Benghazi as, the principal towns, where the majority of Libyan
fighters are culled from,arriving in Iraq. Benghazi and Darnah are also areas
that are hotbeds of extremist activity, as was the case with the September 11th2012
attacks on the US embassy that left the US ambassador Christopher Stevens dead. The Washington
Times quoted Stevens as saying: “A number
of local contacts agreed, noting that Islamic extremism appears to be on the
rise in eastern Libya and that the Al-Qaida flag has been spotted several times
flying over government buildings and training facilities in a small Libyan city
about a 100 miles east of Benghazi”.It should be recalled here that,
President Obama claimed that, a video on social media mocking the prophet of
Islam led to the Benghazi attacks that has been proven to be a lie. The attack
on Benghazi was a pre-planned operation, which the Islamist’s timed to be on
the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks of 2001. Hillary Clinton’s incessant push
for the US to intervene in Libya set the stage for Islamist’s in Libya to
attack the embassy. Another issue never raised by the corporate media , nor the
White House is all requests for increased security in Benghazi were turned down
, and Christopher Stevens’ personal security detail, were instructed to store
their weapons in another location, resultantly because of their orders to
disarm they were literally sitting ducks on September 11th 2012. If
those orders originated in the White House then Obama is directly responsible,
along with Hillary Clinton and their advisor’s for the deaths of Stevens and
other embassy personnel.
His public
admission that the conflict in Iraq is “sectarian”,
is stunning to say the least, as I have pointed out numerous times throughout
this book, the conflict in Iraq and Syria was always and has been “sectarian”, in nature since their
inception. The pretext engendered in the western publics collective
consciousness, by the corporate mass media that the American engineered “Arab Spring”, somehow led to a domino
effect across the Arab world, that saw “moderates’and
secularist’s vying to bring about democracy in their several nations are a
smokescreen fed to the unwitting public. From the outset sectarianism was
fomented as the catalyst to destabilize the Middle Eastern governments that are
aligned within the “Shia Crescent”,
led by Persian Iran which is a predominantly Shiite government, that is
diametrically opposed to the interests of western governments and in
particular, the American government. As
the good General admitted America is providing air-cover for, ethnic cleansing
facilitated by a sectarianist ideology.
Prior to the ouster and murder of
Gadhafi, John McCain visited Libya to address crowds gathered outside
Benghazi’s historic courthouse, where he pledged 25million dollars in US aid to
the Libyan opposition stating: “I have
met with these brave fighters, and they are not al-Qaeda. To the contrary: They
are Libyan patriots who want to liberate their nation. We should help them do
it”. In March 2012, the same courthouse where McCain made his speech would
fly the black flags of Al Qaeda. The American led NATO intervention in Libya
has left the country in a state of perpetual chaos, with warring tribes and
militias seeking to carve out territory and establish their own little
fiefdoms, plunging Libya into a state of perpetual anarchy. The formula that the American led West has
prescribed, for the region is a poison and not an anti-dote, to the complex of
ethnic, socio-cultural and religious sectarian violence that has typified
Middle Eastern politics for centuries.
.png)
Comments