PTAH HAMITIC OR AFRICAN?
Ptah the Egyptian god who according to the myth was a Batwa,
“pygmy”.
Africans were
already using the term Nubian in ancient times as a term of designation of a
distinct, highly developed social, political, religious and cultural ethnic
group in the area in question, before European contact.
The Arab and Berber
did not exist at the primacy of the development of Nubian civilization.
Berbers according
to the Encarta are themselves an Arabized people, how then can an assimilated
primitive culture formed after the Nubian which were a
supra-civilization, be credited with having fathered the modern inhabitants of
Nubia? The utter absurdity in the matter
defies common sense! Scholars still use terms such as Hamitic, Japhetic and
Semitic as terms of designation for the various people groups on the planet.
The terms are in
fact derived from the bible they are the names of the three sons of Noah
namely, Ham, Shem, and Japheth. Ham
fathered the African nations most notable of which are Kush (Ethiopia, Somalia
and Eritrea), Mitsrayim (Egypt), and Phut=Punt (Nubia), Nimrod (Babylon) et al.
Shem fathered certain notables such as Asshur (Assyria), Elam, Aram and
Arphaxad, out of these came the so-called Semites along with their languages. This
is a page from the Illustrated Universal World Atlas and Gazetteer , published
by C.S. Hammond and Company, INC New York U.S.A (1942).
In the section on “Races of Mankind”, the most ridiculous
outright racist and bigoted not to mention purely fictional designations for “ethnicity”, is invented. The
pseudo-scientifical drivle in the “atlas”
will be handled here in brief. Ethiopians are referred to in the book mentioned
above as being of White stock, Somalians, Nubians, are also referred to as “White” or Caucasians. I quote from the
book is justified here: “The Hamites ,
who inhabit north and Northeast Africa belong to the Caucasian branch of
mankind”, even Tuaregs are made into “Hamites”,
a fictional “race”. The bust’s above
of the persons referred to as being of “white
stock”, are all Africans, yet because of there having been discovered
evidence of the people’s referred to as white having developed, high cultures
anciently, the racist Caucasian pseudo-scholar in a failed attempt to make all
high-cultures “white”, created three
primary fictional “races” and called
them Hamites, Semites and Japhetites. On the other hand the same Caucasian Ham
, is blackened by the so called scholars of the type above when it suits their
needs.
The entire body of
literature of the type described previously is simply too, mind boggling and
moronic for me to dedicate much space to its insane claims, I will suffice it
to quote from the esteemed Sudanese scholar Cheik Anta Diop (Diop was the
director of the radiocarbon laboratory at I.F.A.N. at the University of Dakar,
Senegal): ‘ What we cannot possibly
understand is how it has been possible to make a white race of Kemit: Hamite,
black, ebony, etc. Obviously according to the needs of the cause Ham is cursed
, blackened , and made into the ancestor of the “Negroes’. This is what happens
whenever one refers to contemporary social relations. On the other hand he is
whitened whenever one seeks the origin of civilization, because there he is
inhabiting the first civilized country in the world. So the idea of eastern and
western Hamites is conceived-nothing more than a convenient invention to
deprive Blacks of the moral advantage of Egyptian civilization and other
African civilizations. It is impossible to link the notion of Hamite, as we
labor to understand it in official textbooks, with the slightest historical,
geographical, linguistic, or ethnic reality. No specialist is able to pinpoint
the birthplace of the Hamites, (scientifically speaking), the language they
spoke, the migratory route they followed, the countries they settled, or the
form of civilization they may have left. On the contrary, all the experts agree
that this term has no serious content, and yet not one of them fails to use it
as some kind of master-key to explain the slightest evidence of civilization in
Black Africa”.
Comments